Compare promised receipts with accepted quantities and expose recurring late or short deliveries.
Where this helps
A supplier can look reliable if a PO is counted as delivered when only one line arrives. Sourcing needs a scorecard based on the agreed date and complete accepted quantities.
What Rectangle connects
Connect ERP purchase-order line commitments to posted receipts, shortages, rejections, and inbound tracking. Define on-time and in-full explicitly, preserve the original commitment date, and identify customer-approved schedule changes. Include sample size and separate supplier release issues from recorded transport exceptions.
Measure commitments Alder Metals: 50 eligible PO lines
- 42 arrived on time · 46 arrived in full
- 40 met both conditions → OTIF 80%
- OTIF uses the intersection, not an average of the two rates.
A closer look
Compare promised receipts with accepted quantities and expose recurring late or short deliveries.
Find recurring causes AL-6061 is the priority for the supplier review. Six missed commitments involve that alloy.
- Four late supplier releases.
- Two documented transit delays.
- Two short receipts remain open in the wider scorecard.
Alder Metals achieved 80% OTIF: 40 of 50 PO lines met both timing and quantity requirements. Show the four approved date changes separately from the original commitments.
From answer to action
The scorecard supports a focused supplier discussion with evidence by material and receipt. Buyers can review a corrective-action plan or alternate sourcing option. A low score with only a few receipts is treated differently from a consistent pattern over a large sample.
Prepare a supplier review 50-line scorecard with source records attached
- Focus: AL-6061 release readiness and shortage resolution.
- Buyer to agree owners and recovery dates.
- No sourcing allocation changed automatically.
Make supplier conversations specific to missed commitments and affected production materials.
